Against so obstinate a speech of the tribunes, when stupor and silence at the unworthiness of the matter had thereupon fixed the rest of the fathers fast,
Appius Claudius Crassus, grandson of the
decemvir, is said to have come forward to speak against it, out of hatred and wrath more than out of hope, and to have spoken in well-nigh this sense: "It would be neither new nor unlooked-for to me, Quirites, if that one thing which has ever been cast at our family by seditious tribunes I too should now hear—that to the Claudian clan, from its very beginning, nothing has been older in the commonwealth than the majesty of the fathers, and that they have always opposed the advantages of the
plebs. The one of these I neither deny nor disclaim—that we, from the time we were received at once into the
citizenship and the fathers, have strenuously given our toil that it might be said truly that by us the majesty of those clans among which you willed us to be was rather increased than diminished: that other I would dare to maintain, for myself and my forefathers, Quirites—unless one should think that the things which are done for the whole commonwealth are adverse to the plebs, as though it dwelt in another city—that we have done nothing, whether as private men or in magistracies, knowingly that was a hurt to the plebs, and that no deed or word of ours, against your advantage, can truly be alleged, though some have been against your wish. Or could I, if I were not of the Claudian family nor sprung of patrician blood but any one whatever of the Quirites who only knew himself born of two free parents and living in a free state, keep silent that this
Lucius Sextius and this
Gaius Licinius—perpetual tribunes, if it please the gods—have taken to themselves so much license in the nine years through which they reign that they deny they will allow you free power of suffrage, neither in the
elections nor in the ordering of laws? ‘On a condition,’ he says, ‘you shall re-elect us a tenth time tribunes.’ What else is this than to say, ‘What others seek, we so disdain that we will not take it save for a great wage’? But what, pray, is this wage by which we are to have you always
tribunes of the plebs? ‘That you receive,’ he says, ‘our bills, whether they please or displease, whether they are useful or useless, all together.’ I beseech you,
Tarquinian tribunes of the plebs, suppose me, one citizen out of the midst of the
assembly, to cry out: ‘By your good leave, let it be allowed to choose out of these bills those we judge wholesome for us, and to reject the rest.’ ‘It shall not be allowed,’ he says. ‘Are you to order what concerns you all, about usury and lands, and is this
portent not to happen in the city of Rome, that you should see Lucius Sextius and this Gaius Licinius
consuls—which you scorn, which you abhor? Either take all, or I propose nothing.’ As if one should set poison with food before a man whom hunger presses, and bid him either abstain from what is life-giving or mix the deadly with the life-giving. So, if this state were free, would not the assembled people have shouted at you, ‘Be off with your tribunates and your bills’? What? If you do not propose what it is to the people’s advantage to receive, will there be no one to propose it? If any patrician, if anyone—what they would have more invidious—any Claudius should say, ‘Either take all, or I propose nothing,’ who of you, Quirites, would bear it? Will you never look at the matters rather than the authors, but always receive with favorable ears all that yonder
magistrate shall say, and with adverse ears what shall be said by any one of us? But, by
Hercules, his speech is most uncivil; what? Of what sort is the bill, which they take it ill that you rejected? Most like to his speech, Quirites. ‘I propose,’ he says, ‘concerning the consuls, that it be not allowed you to make whom you will.’ Does he ask otherwise, who orders that at all events one consul be made from the plebs, and does not allow you the power of creating two patricians? If today there were wars, such as the Etruscan was
when Porsenna held the Janiculum, such as the Gallic lately, when, save
the Capitol and
the citadel, all this was the
enemy’s, and yonder Lucius Sextius were standing for the consulship along with this
Marcus Furius and any other you please of the fathers, could you bear that Sextius were beyond doubt consul, and
Camillus must struggle against defeat? Is this to call honors into common share, that it be allowed two plebeians to be made consuls, but not two patricians? And that it be of necessity that one be created from the plebs, while it be allowed to pass over both from the fathers? What partnership, what fellowship is this? Is it too little, if, of that whereof your share has so far been none, you come into a share, unless, by seeking a part, you draw the whole? ‘I fear,’ he says, ‘lest, if it be allowed that two patricians be created, you create no plebeian.’ What is that to say but, ‘Because you are not going to create men unworthy of your good will, I will lay on you the necessity of creating those you do not want’? What follows but that he owe not even thanks to the people, if, with two patricians, one plebeian stand, and say that he was created by the law, not by the vote?
aduersus tam obstinatam orationem tribunorum cum prae indignitate rerum stupor silentiumque inde ceteros patrum defixisset, Ap. Claudius Crassus, nepos decemuiri, dicitur odio magis iraque quam spe ad dissuadendum processisse et locutus in hanc fere sententiam esse: ’neque nouum neque inopinatum mihi sit, Quirites, si, quod unum familiae nostrae semper obiectum est ab seditiosis tribunis, id nunc ego quoque audiam, Claudiae gentis iam inde ab initio nihil antiquius in re publica patrum maiestate fuisse, semper plebis commodis aduersatos esse. quorum alterum neque nego neque infitias eo—nos, ex quo adsciti sumus simul in ciuitatem et patres, enixe operam dedisse ut per nos aucta potius quam imminuta maiestas earum gentium inter quas nos esse uoluistis dici uere posset: illud alterum pro me maioribusque meis contendere ausim, Quirites, nisi, quae pro uniuersa re publica fiant, ea plebi tamquam aliam incolenti urbem aduersa quis putet, nihil nos neque priuatos neque in magistratibus quod incommodum plebi esset scientes fecisse nec ullum factum dictumue nostrum contra utilitatem uestram, etsi quaedam contra uoluntatem fuerint, uere referri posse. an hoc, si Claudiae familiae non sim nec ex patricio sanguine ortus sed unus Quiritium quilibet, qui modo me duobus ingenuis ortum et uiuere in libera ciuitate sciam, reticere possim L. illum Sextium et C. Licinium, perpetuos, si dis placet, tribunos, tantum licentiae nouem annis quibus regnant sumpsisse, ut uobis negent potestatem liberam suffragii non in comitiis, non in legibus iubendis se permissuros esse? ’"sub condicione" inquit, "nos reficietis decimum tribunos." quid est aliud dicere "quod petunt alii, nos adeo fastidimus ut sine mercede magna non accipiamus"? sed quae tandem ista merces est qua uos semper tribunos plebis habeamus? "ut rogationes" inquit, "nostras, seu placent seu displicent, seu utiles seu inutiles sunt, omnes coniunctim accipiatis." obsecro uos,
Tarquinii tribuni plebis, putate me ex media contione unum ciuem succlamare "bona uenia uestra liceat ex his rogationibus legere quas salubres nobis censemus esse, antiquare alias." "non" inquit, "licebit tu de fenore atque agris quod ad uos omnes pertinet iubeas et hoc portenti non fiat in urbe Romana uti L. Sextium atque hunc C. Licinium consules, quod indignaris, quod abominaris, uideas; aut omnia accipe, aut nihil fero"; ut si quis ei quem urgeat fames uenenum ponat cum cibo et aut abstinere eo quod uitale sit iubeat aut mortiferum uitali admisceat. ergo si esset libera haec ciuitas, non tibi frequentes succlamassent "abi hinc cum tribunatibus ac rogationibus tuis"? quid? si tu non tuleris quod commodum est populo accipere, nemo erit qui ferat? illud si quis patricius, si quis, quod illi uolunt inuidiosius esse, Claudius diceret "aut omnia accipite, aut nihil fero", quis uestrum, Quirites, ferret? nunquamne uos res potius quam auctores spectabitis sed omnia semper quae magistratus ille dicet secundis auribus, quae ab nostrum quo dicentur aduersis accipietis? at hercule sermo est minime ciuilis; quid? rogatio qualis est, quam a uobis antiquatam indignantur? sermoni, Quirites, simillima. "consules" inquit, "rogo ne uobis quos uelitis facere liceat." an aliter [rogat] qui utique alterum ex plebe fieri consulem iubet nec duos patricios creandi potestatem uobis permittit? si hodie bella sint, quale Etruscum fuit
cum Porsenna Ianiculum insedit, quale Gallicum modo cum praeter Capitolium atque arcem omnia haec hostium erant, et consulatum cum hoc M. Furio et quolibet alio ex patribus L. ille Sextius peteret, possetisne ferre Sextium haud pro dubio consulem esse, Camillum de repulsa dimicare? hocine est in commune honores uocare, ut duos plebeios fieri consules liceat, duos patricios non liceat? et alterum ex plebe creari necesse sit, utrumque ex patribus praeterire liceat? quaenam ista societas, quaenam consortio est? parum est, si, cuius pars tua nulla adhuc fuit, in partem eius uenis, nisi partem petendo totum traxeris? "timeo" inquit, "ne, si duos licebit creari patricios, neminem creetis plebeium." quid est dicere aliud "quia indignos uestra uoluntate creaturi non estis, necessitatem uobis creandi quos non uoltis imponam"? quid sequitur, nisi ut ne beneficium quidem debeat populo, si cum duobus patriciis unus petierit plebeius et lege se non suffragio creatum dicat?