Then
Servilius: “How great a commander
Lucius Aemilius was,
Quirites, if it could be estimated from no other thing, even this were enough: that, when he had in his camp soldiers so seditious and fickle, an
enemy so noble, so rash, so eloquent for instigating the multitude, he had no sedition in his army. The same severity of
command which now they hate, then held them in check. And so, held by the ancient discipline, they neither said anything seditiously nor did. As for
Servius Galba, if he wished to set down his apprenticeship in accusing Lucius
Paulus and to give a proof of his eloquence, he ought not to have hindered the
triumph, which
the Senate—if nothing else—had judged just, but the day after the triumph was held, when he should see him a private man, to lay an information against him and interrogate him by the laws; or a little later, when he himself had first taken a magistracy, to name a day for his enemy and accuse him before the people. So both would Lucius Paulus have a triumph, as the reward of a thing rightly done, for a war excellently waged, and a penalty, if he had done anything unworthy both of his old glory and of his new. But, forsooth, the man of whom he could say no crime, no reproach, his praises he wished to detract. He asked yesterday a whole day for accusing Lucius Paulus: four hours, as much as was left of the day, he consumed in speaking. Who was ever so guilty a defendant, whose vices of life could not be set forth in so many hours? Meanwhile what did he allege, which Lucius Paulus, if he pleaded his cause, would wish denied? Let someone make me for a little two assemblies: one of the Macedonian soldiers, the other purer, of more upright judgment and free from the favor and hatred of the whole Roman people. Before the togaed and urban
assembly let the defendant first be tried. What before the Roman Quirites, Servius Galba, would you say? For that whole speech of yours would be cut away: ‘On guard-duty you stood more severely and more intently; the watches were gone round more bitterly and more diligently; you did more of work than before, since the commander himself went round as an exactor; on the same day you both made a march and went from the march into battle, nor did he suffer you, even as victors, to rest, but at once led you to pursue the enemy. Though by sharing the booty he could make you rich, he is going to carry the royal money across in his triumph and bring it into the treasury.’ These things, just as they have some sting for goading the soldiers’ minds—who think too little has been served to their license, too little to their avarice—so before
the Roman people they would have availed nothing; for that people, not to recall the old things heard from their parents—what disasters were received through the ambition of commanders, what victories gotten by the severity of command—certainly in the most recent
Punic war remembers what difference there was between
Marcus Minucius the master of horse and
Quintus Fabius Maximus the
dictator. And so the accuser could only gape, and the defense of Paulus would be superfluous. Let us pass to the other assembly; nor do I seem about to call you Quirites, but soldiers—if this name at least can strike some blush and bring some shame at the violating of a commander. For indeed I myself am otherwise affected in mind, who seem to speak before an army, than I was a little before, when my speech looked to the urban
plebs. For what do you say, soldiers? Is there anyone at
Rome, except
Perseus, who does not wish a triumph over the
Macedonians? And do you not tear him to pieces with the same hands with which you conquered the Macedonians? He would have prevented you from conquering, if he could, who prevents the triumphant general from entering the city. You err, soldiers, if you think the triumph is the honor only of the commander and not also of the soldiers and of the whole Roman people. Not of Paulus alone is the matter here—many, even who did not obtain a triumph from the Senate, triumphed on the Alban Mount; no one can snatch from Lucius Paulus the glory of the Macedonian war finished any more than from
Gaius Lutatius that of the first Punic war, than from
Publius Cornelius that of the second, than from those who had triumphed; nor will the triumph make Lucius Paulus a lesser or a greater commander—rather, in this the fame of the soldiers and of the whole Roman people is at stake: first, lest it bear the reputation of ill-will and of an ungrateful spirit toward every most distinguished citizen, and seem in this to imitate the Athenian people tearing its chief men with envy. Enough was sinned against
Camillus by your ancestors, whom yet they wronged before the city was recovered from
the Gauls through him; enough lately by you against Publius
Africanus. That
Liternum was the home and seat of the conqueror of
Africa, that at Liternum his tomb is shown—let us blush. Let Lucius Paulus be equal to those men in glory; let him not be made equal to them by your wrong. Let this infamy, then, first be wiped away—foul among other nations, harmful among our own. For who would wish to be like either Africanus or Paulus in an ungrateful state, hostile to good men? If there were no infamy and only glory were at stake, what triumph, pray, does not hold the common glory of the Roman name? So many triumphs over the Gauls, so many over the
Spaniards, so many over
the Carthaginians—are they said to be of the commanders alone, or of the Roman people? As triumphs were held not over
Pyrrhus only, nor over
Hannibal, but over the
Epirotes and the Carthaginians and the Macedonians, so not
Manius Curius only nor Publius Cornelius, but
the Romans triumphed. The soldiers’ cause indeed is their own, who, themselves laurelled and each conspicuous with the gifts with which they were presented, hail the triumph by name, and, singing their own and the commander’s praises, march through the city. If ever the soldiers were not brought back from the province for the triumph, they murmur; and yet even then they believe that they too, though absent, triumph, because by their hands the victory was won. If anyone should ask you, soldiers, for what purpose you were brought back into
Italy and not, the province finished, at once discharged—why you came in numbers to Rome under your
standards, why you tarry here and do not each separately depart to your homes—what else would you answer than that you wished to be seen triumphing? Surely you ought to wish to be beheld as victors. A triumph was lately held over
Philip, the father of this man, and over
Antiochus; both were reigning when the triumph was held over them. Over Perseus, captured, led into the city with his children, will there be no triumph? But if, when
Lucius Anicius and
Gnaeus Octavius were mounting
the Capitol in their chariots, gilded and clad in purple, Lucius Paulus from a lower place, one private man in the crowd of the togaed, should ask, ‘Lucius Anicius, Gnaeus Octavius, do you judge yourselves more worthy of a triumph, or me?’—they would seem about to descend from their chariots and, for shame, to hand over their own insignia to him. And do you, Quirites, prefer that
Gentius rather than Perseus be led in the triumph, and that the triumph be over the accession to the war rather than over the war itself? And shall the legions from
Illyricum enter the city laurelled, and the naval
allies, while the Macedonian legions, their own triumph abrogated, look on at others’? What, then, will become of so rich a booty, of the spoils of so opulent a victory? Where will those so many thousands of arms, stripped from the bodies of the enemy, be hidden away? Or will they be sent back into
Macedonia? Whither the golden, the marble, the ivory statues, the painted tablets, the woven stuffs, so much chased silver, so much gold, so much royal money? Or will they be carried into the treasury by night, as if stolen? What? That greatest spectacle—the most noble and opulent
king captured—where will he be shown to the victorious people? Most of us remember what crowds the captured King
Syphax, an accession to the Punic war, drew together. Shall Perseus the captured king, [and] Philip and
Alexander, the king’s sons, names so great, be withdrawn from the eyes of the state? Lucius Paulus himself, twice
consul, the conqueror of
Greece—all eyes long to behold him entering the city in his chariot; for this we made him consul, that he might finish the war drawn out through four years, to our great shame. To whom, the province allotted, to whom setting out, with presaging minds we destined the victory and a triumph—shall we, now that he is victor, deny the triumph? And indeed defraud not only him but the gods too of their honor? For to the gods too, not to men only, is the triumph owed. Your ancestors both began the beginnings of all great matters from the gods and set the gods as their end. A consul or
praetor setting out for a province and to war, his
lictors in their cloaks, pronounces
vows on the Capitol; the victor, the war accomplished, returns triumphing to the same Capitol, to the same gods to whom he pronounced his vows, bearing the deserved gifts. Not the least part of the triumph are the victims going before, that it may appear the commander returns giving thanks to the gods for the commonwealth well managed. All those victims which he dedicated to be led across in the triumph, slay, one man one, another another. What? Those banquets of the Senate, which are eaten neither in a private place nor in a profane public one, but on the Capitol—are they, for the pleasure of men or the honor of the gods, that, on the authority of Servius Galba, you are going to disturb? Shall the gates be shut to Lucius Paulus’s triumph? Shall Perseus, king of the Macedonians, with his children and the other throng of captives, the spoils of the Macedonians, be left in the
circus-flaminius/">Circus
Flaminius? Shall Lucius Paulus, a private man, go from the gate to his home, as though returning from the country? And you,
centurion, soldier—hear what about Paulus the commander the Senate decreed, rather than what Servius Galba prates; and hear me say this, rather than him. He has learned nothing but to talk, and that itself maliciously and grudgingly; I have fought three-and-twenty times with an enemy on challenge; from all with whom I joined hand, I brought back spoils; I have a body marked with honorable scars, all received on the front of the body.” Then he is said to have stripped himself and to have recounted in what war each wound had been received. While he displayed these, the things which should have been veiled being by chance laid open, a swelling in the groin moved the nearest to laughter. Then: “This too, which you laugh at,” he said, “I have from sitting on horseback day and night; nor am I more ashamed and repentant of it than of these scars, since it was never a hindrance to me in managing the commonwealth well at home and in the field. I, an old soldier, have shown to young soldiers this body often hacked by the sword; let Galba bare his own, sleek and whole. Recall, tribunes, if it seem good,
the tribes to the vote; I [will come] to you, soldiers.”
tribune/">Valerius Antias hands down that the sum of all the captive gold and silver carried across was a hundred and twenty million sesterces; which, without doubt, is made out to be somewhat greater from the number of the wagons and the weights of gold and silver written down, by kind, by Paulus himself. As much again, they hand down, was either consumed in the most recent war or scattered in the flight, when he was making for
Samothrace; and that was the more wonderful, because so much money had been heaped up within thirty years after the war of Philip with the Romans, partly from the produce of the mines, partly from other revenues. And so Philip began to war with the Romans quite needy of money, Perseus on the contrary very rich. Last of all Paulus himself in his chariot, bearing before him a great majesty, both from the rest of his bodily dignity and from old age itself; after the chariot, among other illustrious men, his two sons,
Quintus Maximus and
Publius Scipio; then the cavalry by squadrons and the cohorts of foot, each in its own ranks. To the foot soldier a hundred
denarii each were given, double to the centurion, triple to the horseman. They believe he would have given as much again to the foot soldier, and to the others in proportion, if they had either not opposed his honor or had, at this very sum announced, acclaimed it kindly.
tum
Servilius: ‘quantus imperator L. Aemilius fuerit, Quirites, si ex alia re nulla aestimari possit, vel hoc satis erat, quod, cum tam seditiosos et leves milites, tam nobilem, tam temerarium, tam eloquentem ad instigandam multitudinem inimicum in castris haberet, nullam in exercitu seditionem habuit. eadem severitas imperii, quam nunc oderunt, tum eos continuit. itaque antiqua disciplina habiti neque dixerunt seditiose quicquam neque fecerunt. Servius quidem Galba, si in L. Paulo accusando tirocinium ponere et documentum eloquentiae dare voluit, non triumphum inpedire debuit, quem, si nihil aliud,
senatus iustum esse iudicaverat, sed postero die quam triumphatum esset, privatum cum visurus esset, nomen deferret et legibus interrogaret; aut serius paulo, cum primum magistratus ipse cepisset, diem diceret inimico et eum ad populum accusaret. ita et pretium recte facti triumphum haberet L.
Paulus pro egregie bello gesto et poenam, si quid et vetere gloria sua et nova indignum fecisset. sed videlicet, cui crimen nullum, nullum probrum dicere poterat, eius obtrectare laudes voluit. diem integrum hesterno die ad accusandum L. Paulum petiit: quattuor horas, quantum supererat diei, dicendo absumpsit. quis umquam tam nocens reus fuit, cuius vitia vitae tot horis expromi non possent? quid interim obiecit, quod L. Paulus, si causam dicat, negatum velit? duas mihi aliquis contiones parumper faciat, unam militum Macedonicorum, puram alteram, integrioris iudicii et a favore et odio universi populi Romani. apud contionem togatam et urbanam prius reus agatur. quid apud Quirites Romanos,
Ser. Galba, diceres? illa enim tibi tota abscisa oratio esset ‘in statione severius et intentius institisti; vigiliae acerbius et diligentius circumitae sunt; operis plus quam antea fecisti, cum ipse imperator ut exactor circumiret; eodem die et iter fecisti et in aciem ex itinere isti, ne victorem quidem te adquiescere passus est; statim ad persequendos hostes duxit. cum te praeda partienda locupletem facere posset, pecuniam regiam translaturus in triumpho est et in aerarium laturus.’ haec sicut ad militum animos stimulandos aliquem aculeum habent, qui parum licentiae, parum avaritiae suae inservitum censent, ita apud populum Romanum nihil valuissent, qui, ut vetera atque audita a parentibus suis non repetat, quae ambitione imperatorum clades acceptae sint, quae severitate imperii victoriae partae, proxumo certe Punico bello, quid inter M. Minucium magistrum equitum et Q. Fabium Maximum dictatorem interfuerit, meminit. itaque accusatorem hiscere potuisse et supervacaneam defensionem Pauli fuisse. transeatur ad alteram contionem; nec Quirites vos, sed milites videor appellaturus, si nomen hoc saltem ruborem incutere et verecundiam aliquam imperatoris violandi adferre possit. equidem ipse aliter adfectus animo sum, qui apud exercitum mihi loqui videar, quam paulo ante eram, cum ad plebem urbanam spectabat oratio. quid enim dicitis, milites? aliquis est Romae praeter Persea, qui triumphari de Macedonibus nolit; et eum non iisdem manibus discerpitis, quibus Macedonas vicistis? vincere vos prohibuisset, si potuisset, qui triumphantis urbem inire prohibet. erratis, milites, si triumphum imperatoris tantum et non militum quoque et universi populi Romani esse decus censetis. non unius in hoc Pauli — multi, etiam qui ab senatu non inpetrarunt triumphum, in monte Albano triumpharunt; nemo L. Paulo magis eripere decus perfecti belli Macedonici potest quam C. Lutatio primi Punici belli, quam P. Cornelio secundi; quam illi, qui triumphaverant; nec L. Paulum minorem aut maiorem imperatorem triumphus faciet —, militum magis in hoc universi que populi Romani fama agitur, primum ne invidiae et ingrati animi adversus clarissimum quemque civem opinionem habeat et imitari in hoc populum Atheniensem lacerantem invidia principes suos videatur. satis peccatum in Camillo a maioribus vestris est, quem tamen ante receptam per eum a Gallis urbem violarunt; satis nuper a vobis in P. Africano. Literni domicilium et sedem fuisse domitoris Africae, Literni sepulcrum ostendi erubescamus. gloria sit par illis viris L. Paulus, iniuria vestra ne exaequetur. haec igitur primum infamia deleatur foeda apud alias gentes, damnosa apud nostros. quis enim aut Africani aut Pauli similis esse in ingrata et inimica bonis civitate velit? si infamia nulla esset et de gloria tantum ageretur, qui tandem triumphus non communem nominis Romani gloriam habet? tot de Gallis triumphi, tot de Hispanis, tot de Poenis ipsorum tantum imperatorum an populi Romani dicuntur? quem ad modum non de Pyrrho modo nec de Hannibale, sed de Epirotis Carthaginiensibusque [et Macedonibus] triumphi acti sunt, sic non M’. Curius tantum nec P. Cornelius, sed Romani triumpharunt. militum quidem propria est causa, qui et ipsi laureati et quisque donis, quibus donati sunt, insignes triumphum nomine cient suasque et imperatoris laudes canentes per urbem incedunt. si quando non deportati ex provincia milites ad triumphum sunt, fremunt; et tamen tum quoque se absentis, quod suis manibus parta victoria sit, triumphare credunt. si quis vos interroget, milites, ad quam rem in Italiam deportati et non statim confecta provincia dimissi sitis, quid
Romam frequentes sub signis veneritis, quid moremini hic et non diversi domos quisque abeatis vestras, quid aliud respondeatis, quam vos triumphantis videri velle? vos certe victores conspici velle debebatis. triumphatum nuper de Philippo, patre huius, et de
Antiocho est; ambo regnabant, cum de iis triumphatum est. de Perseo capto, in urbem cum liberis abducto non triumphabitur? quodsi in curru scandentis Capitolium, auratos purpuratosque, ex inferiore loco L. Paulus in turba togatorum unus privatus interroget ‘ L.
Anici,
Cn. Octavi, utrum vos digniores triumpho esse an me censetis?’, curru descensuri et prae pudore videntur insignia ipsi sua tradituri. et vos Gentium quam Persea duci in triumpho mavoltis, Quirites, et de accessione potius belli quam de bello triumphari? et legiones ex
Illyrico laureatae urbem inibunt et navales socii; Macedonicae legiones suo abrogato triumpho alienos spectabunt? quid deinde tam opimae praedae, tam opulentae victoriae spoliis fiet? quonam abdentur illa tot milia armorum detracta corporibus hostium? an in Macedoniam remittentur? quo signa aurea, marmorea, eburnea, tabulae pictae, textilia, tantum argenti caelati, tantum auri, tanta pecunia regia? an noctu tamquam furtiva in aerarium deportabuntur? quid? illud spectaculum maximum, nobilissimus opulentissimus que rex captus, ubi victori populo ostendetur? quos Syphax rex captus, accessio Punici belli, concursus fecerit, plerique meminimus.
Perseus rex captus, Philippus et Alexander, filii regis, tanta nomina, subtrahentur civitatis oculis? ipsum L. Paulum, bis consulem, domitorem Graeciae, omnium oculi conspicere urbem curru ingredientem avent; ad hoc fecimus consulem, ut bellum per quadriennium ingenti etiam pudore nostro tractum perficeret. cui sortito provinciam, cui proficiscenti praesagientibus animis victoriam triumphumque destinavimus, ei victori triumphum negaturi sumus? et quidem non tantum eum sed deos etiam suo honore fraudaturi? dis quoque enim, non solum hominibus, debetur triumphus. maiores vestri omnium magnarum rerum et principia exorsi ab dis sunt et finem eum statuerunt.
consul proficiscens praetorve paludatis lictoribus in provinciam et ad bellum vota in
Capitolio nuncupat; victor perpetrato bello eodem in Capitolium triumphans ad eosdem deos, quibus vota nuncupavit, merita dona portans redit. pars non minima triumphi est victimae praecedentes, ut appareat dis grates agentem imperatorem ob rem publicam bene gestam redire. omnis illas victimas, quas traducendas in triumpho dicavit, alias alio caedente mactate. quid? illae epulae senatus, quae nec privato loco nec publico profano, sed in Capitolio eduntur, utrum hominum voluptatis causa an deorum honoris auctore Ser. Galba turbaturi estis? L. Pauli triumpho portae claudentur? rex
Macedonum Perseus cum liberis et turba alia captivorum, spolia Macedonum, in
circo Flaminio relinquentur? L. Paulus privatus tamquam rure rediens a porta domum ibit? et tu, centurio, miles, quibus ab imperatore Paulo do natus se natus decrevit potius quam quid Ser. Galba fabuletur, audi. et hoc dicere me potius quam illum audi. ille nihil praeterquam loqui, et ipsum id maledice ac maligne, didicit; ego ter et viciens cum hoste per provocationem pugnavi; ex omnibus, cum quibus manum conserui, spolia rettuli; insigne corpus honestis cicatricibus, omnibus adverso corpore exceptis, habeo. ’ nudasse deinde se dicitur et, quo quaeque bello volnera accepta essent, rettulisse. quae dum ostentat, adapertis forte, quae velanda erant, tumor inguinum proximis risum movit. tum ‘hoc quoque, quod ridetis’ inquit, ‘in equo dies noctesque persedendo habeo, nec magis me eius quam cicatricum harum pudet paenitetque, quando numquam mihi impedimento ad rem publicam bene gerendam domi militiaeque fuit. ego hoc ferro saepe vexatum corpus vetus miles adulescentibus militibus ostendi; Galba nitens et integrum denudet. revocate, si videtur, tribuni, ad suffragium tribus; ego ad vos milites,.’ summam omnis captivi auri argentique translati sestertium milliens ducenties fuisse
Valerius Antias tradit; qua haud dubie maior aliquanto summa ex numero plaustrorum ponderibusque auri, argenti generatim ab ipso scriptis efficitur. alterum tantum aut in bellum proxumum absumptum aut in fuga, cum Samothracen peteret, dissipatum tradunt; eoque id mirabilius erat, quod tantum pecuniae intra triginta annos post bellum Philippi cum Romanis partim ex fructu metallorum, partim ex vectigalibus aliis coacervatum fuerat. itaque admodum inops pecuniae Philippus, Perseus contra praedives bellare cum Romanis coepit. ipse postremo Paulus in curru magnam cum dignitate alia corporis, tum senecta ipsa maiestatem prae se ferens; post currum inter alios illustres viros filii duo,
Q. Maximus et
P. Scipio; deinde equites turmatim et cohortes peditum suis quaeque ordinibus. pediti in singulos dati denarii centeni, duplex centurioni, triplex equiti. alterum tantum pediti daturum fuisse credunt et pro rata aliis, si aut non refragati honori eius fuissent aut benigne hac ipsa summa pro nuntiata acclamassent.