At the very time these things were being debated in the senate,
Canuleius, on behalf of his laws and against the
consuls, discoursed thus: "How greatly
the Fathers despise you,
Quirites, how unworthy they hold you to dwell with them in one city within the same walls, I think indeed I have often perceived before, but most of all now, in that they have risen up so fiercely against these bills of ours—by which what else do we do than remind them that we are their fellow-citizens, and, if we have not the same wealth, yet inhabit the same fatherland? By the one we seek the right of
intermarriage, which is wont to be granted to neighbors and to foreigners; we ourselves indeed have given
citizenship, which is more than intermarriage, even to enemies when conquered. By the other we bring in nothing new, but reclaim and put to use that which is the people’s, that
the Roman people may bestow its honors on whom it will. What reason, pray, is there why they should confound heaven and earth, why an assault was just now all but made upon me in the senate, why they declare they will not keep their hands off, and threaten to violate a power that is sacrosanct? If free suffrage is given to the Roman people, that it may bestow the consulship on whom it will, and the hope is not cut off from the plebeian too, if he be worthy of the highest honor, of attaining the highest honor—shall this city be unable to stand? Is it all over with the
command? And does this carry the same weight—that a plebeian be made consul—as though one should say that a slave or a freedman were to become consul? Do you at all perceive in what contempt you live? They would take from you a part of this daylight, if it were allowed; that you breathe, that you utter a voice, that you have the shapes of men, fills them with indignation. Nay more, if it please the gods, they say it is impious that a plebeian be made consul. Pray you, if we are not admitted to the calendars, not to the commentaries of
the pontiffs, do we not even know those things which all foreigners too know—that the consuls succeeded into the place of the kings, and have nothing of right or of majesty that was not in the kings before? Do you believe it was ever heard told that
Numa Pompilius, not only no patrician but not even a Roman citizen, was summoned from the Sabine country and, by the people’s order, with the Fathers’ sanction, reigned at Rome? that thereafter
Lucius Tarquinius, of no Roman nor even Italian stock, son of
Demaratus of Corinth and a settler from
Tarquinii, was made
king while the sons of Ancus lived? that
Servius Tullius after him, born of a captive woman of
Corniculum, of no father and a slave mother, held the kingship by his genius and his worth? For what shall I say of
Titus Tatius the Sabine, whom
Romulus himself, the parent of the city, received into a partnership of the kingship? So then, while no stock in which worth shone forth was disdained, the Roman command grew. Are you now to be ashamed of a plebeian consul, when our ancestors did not disdain foreign kings, and not even when the kings were expelled was the city closed to foreign worth? The Claudian clan, at least, after the expulsion of the kings, we received from
the Sabines not only into the citizenship but even into the number of the patricians. Shall a foreigner become a patrician, then a consul, and shall a Roman citizen, if he be of the
plebs, have the hope of the consulship cut off? Do we, in the end, not believe it can come to pass that a brave and vigorous man, good in peace and war, should be of the plebs, like Numa, Lucius Tarquinius, Servius Tullius? Or, even if there be such a one, shall we not suffer him to come to the helm of the commonwealth, and are we to have consuls liker
the decemvirs, the foulest of mortals, who then were all of the Fathers, than to the best of the kings, new men though they were?
cum maxime haec in senatu agerentur, Canuleius pro legibus suis et aduersus consules ita disseruit: ’quanto opere uos,
Quirites, contemnerent patres, quam indignos ducerent qui una secum urbe intra eadem moenia uiueretis, saepe equidem et ante uideor animaduertisse, nunc tamen maxime quod adeo atroces in has rogationes nostras coorti sunt, quibus quid aliud quam admonemus ciues nos eorum esse et, si non easdem opes habere, eandem tamen patriam incolere? altera conubium petimus, quod finitimis externisque dari solet; nos quidem ciuitatem, quae plus quam conubium est, hostibus etiam uictis dedimus: altera nihil noui ferimus, sed id quod populi est repetimus atque usurpamus, ut quibus uelit populus Romanus honores mandet. quid tandem est cur caelum ac terras misceant, cur in me impetus modo paene in senatu sit factus, negent se manibus temperaturos, uiolaturosque denuntient sacrosanctam potestatem? si populo Romano liberum suffragium datur, ut quibus uelit consulatum mandet, et non praeciditur spes plebeio quoque, si dignus summo honore erit, apiscendi summi honoris, stare urbs haec non poterit? de imperio actum est? et perinde hoc ualet, plebeiusne consul fiat, tamquam seruum aut libertinum aliquis consulem futurum dicat? ecquid sentitis in quanto contemptu uiuatis? lucis uobis huius partem, si liceat, adimant; quod spiratis, quod uocem mittitis, quod formas hominum habetis, indignantur. quin etiam, si dis placet, nefas aiunt esse consulem plebeium fieri. obsecro uos, si non ad fastos, non ad commentarios
pontificum admittimur, ne ea quidem scimus quae omnes peregrini etiam sciunt, consules in locum regum successisse nec aut iuris aut maiestatis quicquam habere quod non in regibus ante fuerit? en unquam creditis fando auditum esse,
Numam Pompilium, non modo non patricium sed ne ciuem quidem Romanum, ex Sabino agro accitum, populi iussu, patribus auctoribus Romae regnasse? L. deinde Tarquinium, non Romanae modo sed ne Italicae quidem gentis,
Demarati Corinthii filium, incolam ab Tarquiniis, uiuis liberis Anci, regem factum?
Ser. Tullium post hunc, captiua Corniculana natum, patre nullo, matre serua, ingenio, uirtute regnum tenuisse? quid enim de
T. Tatio Sabino dicam, quem ipse
Romulus, parens urbis, in societatem regni accepit? ergo dum nullum fastiditur genus in quo eniteret uirtus, creuit imperium Romanum. paeniteat nunc uos plebeii consulis, cum maiores nostri aduenas reges non fastidierint, et ne regibus quidem exactis clausa urbs fuerit peregrinae uirtuti? Claudiam certe gentem post reges exactos ex Sabinis non in ciuitatem modo accepimus sed etiam in patriciorum numerum. ex peregrinone patricius, deinde consul fiat, ciuis Romanus si sit ex plebe, praecisa consulatus spes erit? utrum tandem non credimus fieri posse, ut uir fortis ac strenuus, pace belloque bonus, ex plebe sit, Numae, L. Tarquinio, Ser. Tullio similis, an, ne si sit quidem, ad gubernacula rei publicae accedere eum patiemur, potiusque
decemuiris, taeterrimis mortalium, qui tum omnes ex patribus erant, quam optimis regum, nouis hominibus, similes consules sumus habituri?